A More Considered Club Etiquette

Nuanced etiquette response writing

Вы научитесь: К концу этого задания вы сможете понять предложенные клубом новые правила поведения и написать вежливый ответ, в котором возражаете против одного из них.

Режим погружения

ЧтениеC1Сложно? Смотрите A1

A More Considered Club Etiquette

Nuanced etiquette response writing

Режим погружения

00:0000:00

1×

Шаг 1 из 7

Перед чтением

Частный клуб предлагает новые правила поведения: о дресс-коде, использовании телефонов и знакомстве участников. Один из членов клуба письменно отвечает на это предложение.

Ключевые слова

elevated casual: "elevated casual": стиль одежды немного строже повседневного, но не официальный.
arm’s length: "arm’s length": держаться на расстоянии, не сближаясь и не проявляя симпатии.
blanket ban: "blanket ban": общий запрет, который действует во всех случаях без исключений.
strike the right balance: "strike the right balance": найти разумный баланс между двумя вещами.

Текст · часть 1 из 3

The Hawthorne Club’s committee has proposed an etiquette update intended to modernise its atmosphere without diluting its exclusivity. Members would be encouraged to dress in “elevated casual” clothing: jackets would remain welcome, though no longer obligatory at dinner. The committee argues that this would lower the threshold for participation while preserving a sense of occasion. It also proposes that phones be kept out of sight in the dining room, except when genuinely necessary. According to the paper, visible screens fragment conversation and quietly alienate guests who have come to meet people rather than scroll beside them.

Вопросы

Вопрос 1:

What is the main purpose of the proposed dress-code change?

Показать перевод

Какова главная цель предлагаемых изменений дресс-кода?

To make participation easier while retaining a special atmosphere

To remove all expectations about clothing

Текст · часть 2 из 3

The most contentious proposal concerns networking. Instead of formal introductions arranged by staff, members would be invited to approach one another directly at monthly salons. Supporters believe this would create a more spontaneous, egalitarian culture; critics fear that newcomers may be left at arm’s length while confident regulars dominate the room. A reasonable compromise might be to retain optional introductions for first-time guests. Equally, the phone rule could be reframed as a strong expectation rather than an absolute prohibition, since a blanket ban would be unduly prescriptive for members managing urgent professional or family matters.

Вопросы

Вопрос 2:

Why might some members oppose informal networking?

Показать перевод

Почему некоторые участники могут возражать против неформального знакомства?

They believe staff introductions are too expensive.

They fear confident regulars may dominate while newcomers remain excluded.

Текст · часть 3 из 3

In a response to the committee, a member might write: “I appreciate the intention behind the proposed changes, particularly the effort to make the club less intimidating. However, I cannot support a universal phone restriction in its current form. Discretion and courtesy should certainly be expected, but members should retain limited flexibility when circumstances demand it. I would therefore welcome designated phone areas and a clear expectation that devices remain silent at the table. This would strike the right balance between protecting conversation and recognising that access is not always optional.”